May 13, 2008



Advertisement



Photography by Rebecca D’Angelo

Web Exclusive…

Film Reviews

By Bill Newcott

Bill Newcott, entertainment editor for AARP The Magazine, host of the Movies for Grownups® weekly radio program, and a former New York and Los Angeles film critic, presents his film reviews




Despite Hollywood's infatuation with youth, half of movie tickets are bought by people over 30. "Youth-oriented movies make or break themselves on their opening weekends," says Movies for Grownups® host Bill Newcott. "But three of the highest-grossing movies of all time—the grownup-oriented My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Dances with Wolves, and A Beautiful Mind—never reached number one at the box office. How did they manage that success? It was thanks to mature audiences, who kept those movies in the theaters for months."


May 2008


Then She Found Me

ThinkFilm

Then She Found Me (R)
starstarstarstarstar

Co-writer/director/star Helen Hunt proves three things with her new big-screen comedy, Then She Found Me. As an actress she remains one of our top-tier, too-seldom-seen performers; as a first-time feature director she admirably wrangles her dream cast with a steady hand; and as a writer she should hire somebody to tell her when the sixth or seventh plot twist is just one too many.

The unfolding plot of Then She Found Me seems, at times, to require a scorecard. Hunt plays a nondescript schoolteacher whose unremarkable life suddenly begins taking one unexpected turn after another, including, in no particular order, abandonment by her husband, a sudden death in the family, a surprise love, a spontaneous reconciliation, an unexpected pregnancy, and the sudden appearance of a long-lost mother in the person of Bette Midler (who claims that our heroine was the result of a one-night stand with Steve McQueen). Any one or two of those devices would pretty much do as a sustained story line—and indeed, they all have a special resonance for a grownup audience. But here, as each new plot element piles onto those that came before, it all becomes downright numbing. Finally, when the story takes a truly heartbreaking turn, we—and the characters—virtually shrug it off.

Still, Then She Found Me's script weaknesses are nearly redeemed by one of the most appealing casts in recent memory. Hunt is bravely willing to trade her willowy beauty for an emphatically downtrodden demeanor, her careworn face frozen in a frown that her character wears with a seeming sense of entitlement. Matthew Broderick, who ought to be downright despicable as her off-to-the-races hubby, is so dumbly charming that we half hope she'll take him back. Colin Firth turns up the English charm to an irresistible level. And as the suddenly resurfaced mom, Midler starts out a tad too frenetic, but soon settles into a nicely rounded performance as a woman who desperately wants to tell the truth, but finds lies so much more interesting.

For her first outing in the director's chair, Hunt proves she can move a story along. I hope she directs some more…but she should really be spending more time in front of the camera, too.




April 2008


Young@Heart

Fox Searchlight

Young@Heart (PG)
starstarstarstarstar

"Should I stay or should I go now?/If I go there will be trouble/And if I stay it will be double"

To millions of fans middle-aged and younger, those words from the punk rock band The Clash evoke the angst of a troubled lover. But put those words in the mouth of a 92-year-old woman, and they take on a haunting poignancy, a meditation on life’s advancing twilight: one foot here, one trembling foot tracing a path somewhere beyond.

Young@Heart, a truly enchanting documentary about a Massachusetts chorus of singers in their 70s, 80s, and 90s, is brimming with such breathless moments—but also with astonishing energy and good humor.

Eileen Hall is the 92-year-old London Blitz survivor who tackles the Clash number. She’s the oldest member of the group, which numbers roughly two dozen. The number keeps changing, partly because new members become chronologically eligible all the time (and you thought that invite from AARP when you turned 50 was unnerving!) and inevitably, because others leave for health reasons, temporary or permanent.

British director Stephen Walker follows the group for seven weeks, during rehearsals leading up to a performance in their home town of Northampton. Along the way, they pound out versions of David Bowie’s “Golden Years,” James Brown’s “I Feel Good,” the Bee Gees’ “Stayin’ Alive,” and, for the film’s true shocker, The Ramones’ “I Wanna Be Sedated.” With each performance, it’s like hearing the lyrics for the first time.

One highlight planned for the concert is a duet of “Fix You” by the rock band Coldplay, sung by two engaging guys named Fred and Bob. For reasons I’d best let the movie explain, by opening night the duet has become a solo. There sits Fred—his oxygen tank hissing softly in the background—singing the song’s words of loss and regret: Lights will guide you home/And ignite your bones/And I will try to fix you.

The song ends in a solemn silence, and then, like a crashing wave, the audience on the screen leaps to its feet in applause. If I weren’t such a jaded movie reviewer, I would have joined them.




21

Sony Pictures Classics

Married Life (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

There's something stubbornly nostalgic about all the smoking going on in Married Life, a drama set in 1949 and masterfully acted by the immensely appealing foursome of Chris Cooper, Pierce Brosnan, Patricia Clarkson, and Rachel McAdams. Here are all these smart, accomplished people and all their friends, happily puffing away, blithely oblivious to the fact that they are living not only dangerously, but suicidally. They're very good smokers, too—the cast has clearly mastered the lost arts of taking a thoughtful drag between phrases, emphasizing important points with a quick jab of a smoldering butt, and the remarkable trick of letting loose a dense little swirl of smoke and then, with a swift intake of breath, pulling it back in. That last stunt has special dramatic significance in this wonderful little film, as the characters seem forever on the brink of blurting out important revelations, only to withdraw them at the last possible second.

Cooper, one of our most reliably brilliant actors, plays a buttoned-down executive with a problem: He's madly in love with a vivacious young blonde (McAdams, whose irresistibility is manifest) but considers himself too soft-hearted to break the news to his wife (the likewise delightful, if chronologically more advanced, Clarkson). So he muddles on, seeing his girl on the side while professing love for his wife, in a sordid little scenario that he has somehow convinced himself is heroic. He confesses all this to his best friend (Brosnan), a confirmed bachelor who also happens to become smitten the instant he meets his pal's illicit beloved.

Soon the friend begins scheming to get the girl for himself, the guy's wife is revealed to be a tad less stoic than we first thought...and the philandering hubby himself decides the best way to spare his dear wife the humiliation of divorce and abandonment is to, well, kill her.

Married Life easily might have veered off into one of two all-wrong directions: It could have become a dark comedy, with tragic misunderstandings and black-hearted motivations played strictly for nasty laughs. Or it could have been played as a film noir, a Postman Always Rings Twice knockoff that would ring as hollow as virtually all latter-day efforts at the genre (the Coen brothers notwithstanding).

Happily, director-cowriter Ira Sachs falls into neither trap. He repeatedly surprises us with unexpected turns. Under his measured hand, the proceedings become a meditation on marriage itself—the ebb and flow of passion, love, and companionship—and on the pains and rewards that can come to those who must choose whether or not, in the words of Brosnan's worldly playboy, "to build their happiness on the sorrow of others." The finale is neither grimly stark nor overly sentimental—but as bittersweet and satisfying as, I imagine, a nice new pack of Chesterfields used to be in the old days, before we knew better.




21

Twentieth Century Fox

Horton Hears a Who! (G)
starstarstarstarstar

Exquisitely animated it is, but the real reason to soak in the new screen version of Dr. Seuss's Horton Hears a Who! is some of the most inspired voice work I've ever heard in a cartoon—and you're getting this from someone who has at least sampled every major 'toon made since Winsor McCay took a pencil to Gertie the Dinosaur back in 1914.

Forget the computer animator's fetish for every-little-hair detail, and forget even the astonishing character animation, which uncannily captures the expressions and mannerisms of the soundtrack's real-life actors. With voices like these, directors Jimmy Hayward and Steve Martino could have given us a blank screen. Jim Carrey's Horton—the elephant who discovers an entire city of little beings living on a speck of dust—is a playground of childlike inflection, his tone plying the spectrum from wonderment to petulance to indignity. Steve Carell's performance as the Mayor of Whoville—the guy with whom Horton communicates through a jerry-rigged drainpipe—includes occasional tonal references to his role on TV's The Office: that patented, halting free-association riff that brands him the thinking man's idiot. But Carell also spins off into the relatively uncharted territories of warm affection (for his 96 daughters and one son) and unfettered panic.

The rest of the cast is sterling, as well. There's Carol Burnett, stuffy and sniffy as the mean old Kangaroo (and given a nice bit of redemption at the end); Arrested Development's Will Arnett as a Bela Lugosi-inspired vulture named Vlad; Knocked Up star Seth Rogen as Horton's sidekick pal (a small rodent-type critter, the exact type of which I didn't catch); and perhaps best of all, as the narrator who gives voice to Dr. Seuss's ageless rhyme, the incomparable CBS News Sunday Morning host Charles Osgood. That kind of care in voice casting would animate even a science class slide show. Augmented by the gloriously rich palate of Horton, the stars end up giving some of the best performances of their long careers.




March 2008


21

Sony Pictures

21 (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

Movies about card players are almost always boring for me. Sorry, but it's true. Even last year's Lucky You, with no less star power than Robert Duvall, Eric Bana, and Drew Barrymore, left my eyes glazed over as I tried to follow the vagaries of poker. Invariably, directors of these films will resort to the old "shifting eyes" shots—extreme close-ups of each player's face, the eyes darting back and forth, the nearly inscrutable squints supposedly cluing us in as to just who is winning and who is not.

So the best thing about 21, the new movie about a team of supersmart MIT students who sufficiently perfect their card counting technique to take it to the big leagues, is that halfway through I felt I actually understood not only blackjack but how to effectively cheat at it. Of course, on the way home that night I realized I understood absolutely nothing—but the neat trick pulled off by director Robert Luketic and his wonderfully appealing cast was in lulling me into the false sense of insider-ness, as if I were privy to all the secrets and smarts necessary to stick it to The House.

Based on the nonfiction book Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six MIT Students Who Took Vegas for Millions, 21 is, well, the inside story of six MIT students who took Vegas for millions. The youngsters on hand are wonderfully attractive and admirably earnest—in fact, Jim Sturgess, Kate Bosworth, and Aaron Yoo are entirely too gorgeous to ever successfully blend into the scenery of a Vegas casino, as any good card counter must in order to remain undetected. But the film really belongs to Kevin Spacey as the team's mentor, a smoothly sleazy MIT math professor who uses his position to spot promising new talent. Spacey's considerable charm works its magic on the kids—and on us—so effectively that when he shows himself to be less than the youngsters' best buddy, well, we're pretty much as shocked as they are. Likewise, Laurence Fishburne as an old-school casino security guy keeps us guessing as to his true motivations. But he brings such a sense of authority to every role he plays, each apparent mutation in his character's approach to the card-countin' kids is utterly believable.

You probably won't come away from 21 ready to clean up in Vegas. But you will enjoy a couple of hours with some pretty sharp customers, and perhaps develop some newfound admiration for that weird high school math teacher who always seemed to be hiding something.




Bonneville

SenArt Films

Bonneville (PG)
starstarstarstarstar

Buddy pictures rarely bring out the artistic best in their stars. The Rat Pack movies were hardly the finest dramatic hours for Frank, Dean, or Sammy. And even the recent, well-received Bucket List was essentially a showcase for co-stars Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman to have the time of their lives together.

But friendship flicks featuring top-line actresses (think Thelma and Louise) don't come along very often. So it's nice to report that Bonneville—featuring Oscar winners Jessica Lange and Kathy Bates and three-time Oscar nominee Joan Allen—is a consistently entertaining opportunity to watch three of the screen's most gifted women enjoy one another's company while more or less slumming it through a rather routine road flick.

Lange plays a recent widow from Idaho who is begrudgingly delivering her late husband's ashes, at his resentful daughter's demand, to a memorial service in Santa Barbara, California. She could fly there, but instead she and her two pals decide to make the trip by automobile. The car they end up driving is—you guessed it—hubby's vintage Bonneville convertible (although Utah's Bonneville Salt Flats do make a cameo appearance, as well).

That's pretty much the plot. We're more or less plopped down in the back seat listening in on the trio's conversations, watching them cavort like school kids on a motel waterbed, and standing by as (spoiler alert: this is one of the film's more surprising twists) the ever-entertaining Bates is courted by a dashing Tom Skerritt. The dialogue by first-time screenwriter Daniel D. Davis rings more true than most interfemale banter we've been forced to sit through in the movies, and you'd expect nothing less from three actresses who have spoken some of the most lyrical scripts of the past decade or so. And second-time director Christopher N. Rowley keeps the story moving along when it could threaten to bog down in just-us-girls hijinks.

Bonneville might not make the final cut of its stars' lifetime achievement reels, but it's clear they've seldom had more fun on the set. For the audience, their obvious delight is contagious.




Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day

Focus Features

Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

Remember the Oscars? Remember how 90 percent of the movies honored that night were about as jolly as a puppy's funeral? Well now, the lighter-than-air comedy Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day would seem to be Hollywood's chipper chuck to the chin, a friendly "cheer up, old boy, life's not all that dour!"

The wonderful Frances McDormand is the title character—a down-on-her-luck London governess who finds herself hopelessly unemployed at the outset of World War II. She finagles a position in the household of a bubbly American starlet (Amy Adams, most recently the star of Enchanted) and soon finds herself swept into the vortex of her new boss's, shall we say, complicated social life: three handsome suitors, all bent on marrying her, none aware that the others exist.

It's all veddy British, and veddy funny. The trailers seem to focus on the abundant pratfalls and exaggerated double takes that are part and parcel of farce, but there's something much more substantial afoot here: As the relationship between the women deepens and the strict rules of Britain's class system melt away, shadows of the coming, more egalitarian post-war Western world seem to unfold before our eyes.

Oscar-winner McDormand provides the much-needed anchor for all the door-slamming and wild misunderstandings. And Adams—sweet and sexy in a way most actresses can only dream possible—continues to emerge as one of the screen's reliably endearing stars. If Hollywood really is rousing itself from a grumpy night's sleep, Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day could not be a more delightful wake-up call.




February 2008


Be Kind Rewind

New Line Cinema

Be Kind Rewind (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

As warmly wonderful and endlessly inventive as any movie you'll see this or any year, Be Kind Rewind is a big, sloppy kiss on the face of humanity, a comic fable infused with genuinely felt notions of brotherhood, community, and old-fashioned decency.

A kindly old neighborhood merchant (Danny Glover) goes on a trip, leaving his modest Passaic, New Jersey, video rental shop in the hands of two good-hearted but hopelessly inept friends, Jerry and Mike (Jack Black and Mos Def). Almost as soon as the shop owner leaves town, Jerry, through an outrageous series of events, has accidentally erased every VHS tape in the place. (The proprietor, knowing most of his customers are still stuck with their old VCRs, hasn't moved on to the DVD age.) Terrified that they've destroyed their friend's business—the city is already threatening to condemn the dilapidated storefront—Jerry and Mike set about trying to re-create each lost movie using a vintage '80s camcorder.

First up: Ghostbusters. We see the guys setting up each scene, their low-budget, lower-tech approximations at once charmingly amateurish and oddly auteur-ish. The iconic Ghostbusters scenes are all there: the haunted library (filmed using unsuspecting patrons at the Passaic branch), the "We're ready to believe you!" TV ad (with Jerry and Mike squeezing behind a cardboard cutout TV, their fingers pointing well beyond the plane of the TV "screen"), the demon in the refrigerator (a neighborhood cat). Of course, the first customer—a marvelously encouraging Mia Farrow—isn't fooled for a second. But she shows the tape to friends, who start a snaking line of customers pounding on the video shop door, demanding that the pair make more "à la carte" versions of their favorite movies. And so Jerry and Mike crank up production, turning out cut-rate versions of classics like King Kong and 2001: A Space Odyssey—plus lesser home video favorites like Rush Hour 2. Their endless ingenuity echoes the earlier work of Be Kind Rewind's writer-director Michel Gondry himself, who in movies like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and The Science of Sleep has always preferred to rely on complex yet nondigital effects to depict wild flights of imagination.

Of course, every movie needs some sort of conflict, so an officious movie studio representative (Sigourney Weaver, who could well step right back into her sultry Ghostbusters role as the sexy Gatekeeper) shows up to shut down production. But Gondry's really not interested in human pettiness: the studio rep, tough as she is, is no villain. She sincerely believes in her responsibility to protect her clients' rights. Likewise, the Passaic city officials who want to demolish the video shop only wish to create a better city for their citizens, and even the kindly old merchant they're displacing never argues otherwise. In Gondry's world, everyone is out to make the world a better place; everyone wants to find some way to get along; and everyone gets a pass when it comes to ulterior motives. It's a fairy-tale land, for sure, but in a society that at times seems to go out of its way to construct the most artificial of conflicts, Gondry's Passaic is also a lovely place to visit.

The neighborhood's ultimate plan to save the shop, hopelessly naive and doomed from the start, is portrayed nevertheless as a noble crusade. We buy into it completely, and it doesn't hurt that Gondry throws in some shades of It's a Wonderful Life for good measure. If the story ends on an ambiguous note, there's no doubt of Gondry's vision: The qualities of innocence, trust, and honesty, ridiculed and dismissed by a cynical world, are in fact the only traits that can ultimately redeem us.




The Spiderwick Chronicles

Paramount Pictures

The Spiderwick Chronicles (PG)
starstarstarstarstar

As one born in the Bronx, I hereby wish to protest mightily the tendency among filmmakers to forever place Bronx and Brooklyn accents (and be honest, is there a difference?) in the mouths of the uncouth, the creepy, and the disgusting. I’ve just come from a screening of The Spiderwick Chronicles, a dizzyingly busy screen adaptation of the kids’ book series, and let me put it to you this way: As the cute-as-a-button family unit involved, the always-lovely Mary-Louise Parker and the well-scrubbed kid actors Freddie Highmore and Sarah Bolger could pass diction muster on Beacon Hill. But as for the hordes of demonic toad-like creatures who noisily terrorize them, well, let’s just say their scenes brought me back to my boyhood days in the bleachers at Yankee Stadium. Worse, the moment they open their mouths, their scariness is undermined: they sound like refugees from a Raid insecticide commercial (and, come to think of it, their demise is kind of like that, too).

It’s worth mentioning only because what could have been a totally immersive movie experience is largely spoiled by director Mark Waters’s choice to follow that well-worn voice-casting road. Visually, The Spiderwick Chronicles is quite unlike anything you’ve ever seen. The story of a magical book, discovered by a lonely boy in the dusty attic of a remote country house, has remarkable charm. The book, you see, opens his eyes to a universe of fairies and gnomes (and also somewhat less pleasant beings) invisible to the vast, inattentive mass of humanity. And that’s a sweet little lesson: The world around you is full of wonder, if only you’ll look for it.

And director Waters does conjure up some truly wondrous, if too-brief, glimpses: dandelions that sprout faces, a magnificent flying griffin, an adorable gnome peeking from behind a coffee can. These are truly jaw-dropping moments, and the art of computer animation, now taken utterly for granted by all of us, has seldom been more seamlessly accomplished. Young Highmore—who, had he been born a generation earlier, would have been Jack Wild as the Artful Dodger in Oliver!—jettisons his emphatic British accent to play not one all-American boy, but twins. It’s a somewhat unnecessary plot device that may play better in the books than in the movie, but the special effects and stunt-double work involved in putting forth the two Freddies are absolutely convincing. And two wonderful grownup pros, David Strathairn (Good Night, and Good Luck) and Joan Plowright (Mrs. Palfrey at the Claremont) bring much-needed poignancy to the proceedings as a long-separated father and daughter. Never mind the chronological complications—he’s 59, she’s 78. That particular twist is one of the most charming elements of the film, and if that’s not reason enough for you to spend some time thumbing through The Spiderwick Chronicles, well, then, fuhgeddaboudit.




Michael Clayton

Warner Bros.

Michael Clayton (R)
starstarstarstarstar

Late January-early February is absolutely the dregs when it comes to new movie openings (unless you're champing at the bit to catch the Hannah Montana concert flick), so we can thank Warner Brothers for re-releasing last year's underseen thriller Michael Clayton. By all means get a hold of the DVD when it comes out, but if you can, first rush into a theater to immerse yourself in Tony Gilroy's riveting meditation on the daily tiny compromises we make, and how by midlife they can accumulate to the point where we've utterly forgotten what our core values are.

George Clooney is the title character, a worn-down "fixer" for a New York corporate law firm. It's a remarkable performance. Against all odds, Clooney finds a way to deaden the easy charm he naturally effuses, looking downright haggard and detached as Clayton helps wealthy clients worm their way out of legal and personal crises (we first meet him being summoned to a rich guy's house to cover up a hit-and-run accident). Clayton is miserable, and as he mopes along with a perpetual sigh, he sees himself as destined to hoe this particular row for the rest of his life.

That all changes when he finds himself face to face with a colleague whose profound guilt over the lifetime of professional wrongs he's committed has driven him off the deep end. Tom Wilkinson plays the tortured attorney, Arthur Edens, and though it's a supporting role, his is the pivotal performance in the film. Wilkinson attacks the part with an ingenious balance of focused intensity and wild abandon: Arthur is clearly off his rocker, yet at the heart of his meltdown is the sobering realization that he has devoted his career, his talents, his very soul to propping up the world's bad guys. Wilkinson, one of our great actors at the top of his game, is a wonder to watch—and incidentally the hands-down winner of this year's Movies for Grownups® Best Supporting Actor Award.

Michael Clayton bristles with marvelously edgy performances—Tilda Swinton is breathtaking as the corporate lawyer who, having crashed through the glass ceiling, lives in constant terror that the powerful men around her will see her picking the shards from her skin. And Sydney Pollack, a fine director whose own films often explore the soullessness of corporate America (The Firm, Tootsie), is great fun as Clayton's boss.

Audiences didn't exactly flock to Michael Clayton its first time around—the off-putting title may have had something to do with that. Not only does this film deserve its own audience, but a strong box office sendoff might encourage studios to make more smart, bracing thrillers like this.




January 2008


Cassandra's Dream

The Weinstein Company

Cassandra's Dream (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

Remember when people used to yearn for the old “funny” Woody Allen? I don’t hear that much anymore, and Cassandra’s Dream, the latest in Allen’s Britain-based psychological thrillers, is probably part of the reason. The older he gets, and the darker his vision becomes, the more he excels at this sort of small-scale caper, scrounging around at the muddy bottom of human nature. I remain one of the dozen or so folks who still admit to laughing out loud at new Woody Allen comedies, but when he puts on his black hat, man, you’d better bring a klieg light to see through the gloom.

This time Allen gives us two brothers (Ewan McGregor and Colin Farrell), both of whom are having financial problems. They go to their rich uncle (Tom Wilkinson) for help and he agrees to bankroll them, with one condition: they have to kill a troublesome business associate. As with Allen’s previous London-based thriller, Match Point, most of the guilty fun for us comes in the lead-up to the crime. Allen has mastered the art of methodically ratcheting up the tension, each scene amounting to a step-by-step tutorial on how to commit murder: getting the gun, stealing the locksmith’s tools, staking out the victim’s house. By the time the trigger gets pulled—and Allen characteristically turns his camera away at the very last instant—we are virtually implicated in the crime ourselves, and as the scheme inevitably begins to unravel in the final act, we share in the killers’ sense of the world closing in on them.

Cassandra’s Dream—named for a sailboat that figures in the plot—could use a good 15-minute trim; Allen lets the scenes depicting Farrell’s descent into doubt and self-loathing go on a bit long. But once again, the director proves himself to be a master at drawing breathtaking performances from his cast. As usual, Wilkinson (winner of this year’s Movies for Grownups® Best Supporting Actor Award for his role in Michael Clayton) astonishes. As benevolent, self-assured Uncle Howard, he descends in a single shot to a venal, murderous schemer. It’s a shocking metamorphosis—reason enough to spend a couple of hours aboard Cassandra’s Dream.



The Bucket List

Warner Bros.

The Bucket List (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

There’s a nugget of conventional baseball wisdom that says no matter how stellar a player’s performance is on the field, unless his team is a winner, he’ll never be named the league MVP. I thought about that while watching The Bucket List, the new sort-of comedy that features two all-star performances by Morgan Freeman and Jack Nicholson.

Think of Freeman as a supercool pitcher, towering on the mound, spinning curveballs that loop-de-loop to the plate and bamboozle one batter after another. And there’s Nicholson, the hotshot shortstop, spearing frozen rope liners and turning unassisted double plays. Meanwhile, it appears the rest of the team, and the manager and the coaches, have never gotten off the team bus.

The film’s concept is a good one: Two guys, newly diagnosed with terminal illnesses, meet up in a hospital and decide to create a “bucket list,” a catalog of things they want to do before they kick the bucket. Next, it’s off to see the world and tick off the list: skydive, see the pyramids, drive a racecar, go on safari, etc. It has all the elements of a slam-bang road picture worthy of Bing and Bob. You need only make sure of one thing: get those guys out of that hospital room as soon as possible. Yet astonishingly, director Rob Reiner and writer Justin Zackham keep the guys on an IV drip a full 39 minutes into the film. And when the two finally do head off for their end-of-a-lifetime trip, the whirlwind of adventures comes in a rapid, haphazard progression that screams for some sort of dramatic structure, but in practice resembles one of Lowell Thomas’s old Cinerama travelogues.

What’s more, for an accomplished director, Reiner can be awfully sloppy. Much is made of a scene in which Nicholson’s head is shaved for surgery, yet before he leaves the hospital in a week or so, not only has it grown back, it’s even flying off to the side in the star’s trademark wild-man-with-bed-head look.

So the truth is, The Bucket List shouldn’t be very good at all. Still, the headliners wring every molecule of stardust from their performances. As always, Freeman adds his unique blend of charm and dignity to the proceedings, but he’s also a whole lot funnier here than he ordinarily allows, seemingly liberated by his proximity to his anything-goes co-star. And Nicholson, while providing ample doses of his smirky bad-boy persona, proves to be touchingly vulnerable, particularly in the early going, curled up in his hospital bed, utterly alone with the news that he has barely a year to live. Together, they seem to be having the time of their lives, using sheer force of will to infuse the sometimes creaky dialogue with shades of meaning I’m guessing the writer never even imagined.

The lessons The Bucket List has to teach us are unremarkable, yet always worth revisiting: money can’t buy happiness (or long life), holding a grudge hurts you more than the person you’re grudging against, your dreams are worth following, and Jack Nicholson still looks awesome in shades. I can live with that.




December 2007


The Kite Runner

Paramount Classics

The Kite Runner (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

An awful lot of "epic" historical dramas seem content to take a few characters who could fit into virtually any era from the Renaissance to Reconstruction, plop them down into a picturesque period, and let 'er rip. On the other hand, great epic films—we're talking the likes of Doctor Zhivago and Gone With the Wind—weave a seamless fabric of character and place, creating a sense of inevitability when it comes to what's happening to whom and when. The Kite Runner, a sweeping story of boyhood friendships, geopolitical upheaval, and personal redemption, takes its place among those great epics as a compelling, often devastating story driven not only by the small-scale dramas it depicts, but also by the cultural and political turbulence surrounding them.

Amir and Hassan are two boys growing up in Kabul, Afghanistan, in the 1970s. They are of different social classes but united in their love of kite fighting—a peculiar sport in which competitors try to entangle and cut down each other's kites. The film's early kite fight sequences, visually enthralling in their color and swooping action, stand in stark contrast to later visions of Kabul under the domination of first the Soviets and then the Taliban, where even the trees are sheared away to create a stark, lifeless landscape. Director Marc Foster (who helmed the deeply disturbing Monster's Ball and the playfully twisted Stranger than Fiction) doesn't spare our sensibilities as we witness the repeated rape of Afghanistan. But he's also a wonderfully humane storyteller; the brutal assault on one of the young boys, the pivotal event of the movie, is seen primarily in the panicked eyes of his best friend, watching terrified from around a corner. The attack's aftermath pushes the boys apart, and before long Amir and his father (an intellectual, a commodity valued by neither the Soviets nor the Taliban) must escape from Kabul. We find them, years later, living amongst fellow refugees in San Francisco where Amir, played as an adult by the quietly evocative Khalid Abdalla, never forgets his friend…nor forgives himself for the unspeakable injustice he helped perpetrate against him.

Determined to make things right, he returns to Taliban-controlled Kabul, witnessing one atrocity after another. And while Amir's settling of accounts with his old friend doesn't turn out precisely as he expected, he does make amends—after some heartbreaking side trips and a rousing chase across a bleakly beautiful landscape (with western China standing in for war-torn Afghanistan).

If you go to see The Kite Runner, be sure to bring your reading glasses. More than three-quarters of the film is spoken in Afghan dialects. But you don't need to speak the language to appreciate the compelling performances—particularly that of Homayoun Ershadi as Amir's father. Born in Iran in 1947, Ershadi was an architect before he turned to acting—and here his character provides the moral center of the movie, instilling in his son the values of integrity that drive Amir for the rest of the movie, leading him back into the jaws of death in Afghanistan. It's an inspiring performance, and one of the main reasons The Kite Runner flies as high as it does.




Atonement

Focus Features

Atonement (R)
starstarstarstarstar

About an hour into Atonement, a visually stunning, if emotionally flat, World War II-era story of adolescent lies and grownup passions, director Joe Wright takes us on a breathtakingly complex, single-shot tour of the beach at Dunkirk. For a full five minutes we wander with a young British soldier (James McAvoy) among tens of thousands of comrades in arms, a roiling mass of humanity awaiting either rescue by sea or annihilation by the Nazis. It's a surreal vision: cavalry horses and motor vehicles alike are being destroyed to prevent their appropriation by the enemy; drunken soldiers are biding their time on the seaside resort's Ferris wheel and kiddie rides; a choir of military men stands at attention on a gazebo, singing a hymn.

It's an indelible scene, one that haunts the viewer hours after leaving the theater, and perhaps it's unfair to expect the story, a sob-seeking tale of lovers separated by a false accusation, to measure up. And the truth is, Wright's visionary filmmaking style—with its exquisitely staged tableaus of floating bodies, stately manors, and impossibly beautiful actors—can't entirely sustain what is, in the end, a narrative that masquerades as an epic love story but would work equally well as a one-act play.

McAvoy plays the son of a housekeeper to one of those to-the-manor-born families that, from the moment they glide onscreen—with the men's ramrod posture, the women's pale skin and silky gowns, and everyone's shrouded allusions to Britain's class system—fairly scream Masterpiece Theatre. The housekeeper's son has not only managed to better himself by getting a university education; he has also wormed his way into the heart of the family's stunningly beautiful daughter (Keira Knightley). But there's also a younger sister (Saoirse Ronan) who, jealous or confused or just plain nuts (we're never really quite sure), manufactures a false accusation that, in the course of a single change of scene, blows everybody's happiness to smithereens.

It's all based on a successful novel by Ian McEwan, and I imagine it's all easier to swallow on the printed page. But it's also difficult to imagine the book conjuring mental pictures to rival the astonishing feast for the eyes provided by Joe Wright and his cinematographer, Seamus McGarvey. Let's hope their future projects will explore subjects and characters as compelling as their artistic ambitions.



Savages

Fox Searchlight

The Savages (R)
starstarstarstarstar

"We are horrible, horrible people," cries Wendy Savage (Laura Linney) in the parking lot of her father's new nursing home. "Horrible, horrible, horrible people." But in this deft, dark comedy, committing her father, a dementia patient, to fairly congenial care isn't the worst of it. What's really horrible is that her partner in this decision, her older brother, Jon (Philip Seymour Hoffman), cannot comfort her. Instead, he stands stiffly beside her in the frigid air, his eventual attempt at a hug rebuffed.

Both siblings in The Savages are achingly awkward, though in different ways. Wendy temps and writes unproduced plays; Jon is a theater professor perpetually at work on a Bertolt Brecht bio. Neither has a family. Their psychological growth, it seems, was stunted by their depressive mother and abusive father. But the siblings are jarred from their mildly dysfunctional, self-centered lives to care for their estranged father, played by Broadway legend Philip Bosco, perhaps best known to TV audiences as a judge on Law & Order: Special Victims Unit.

Though they're both around 40, Jon and Wendy's childhood rivalry is always gnawing at the edges of their conversations. And these characters are played by two of the best film actors working today: Hoffman has one Oscar already and Linney has two nominations. Their performances ring so true that, as the story unfolds, you almost begin to worry what will become of their characters after the film is over.

The father's fate, on the other hand, is not in doubt. With spitting-mad outbursts and the occasional sad smile, Bosco touchingly embodies the slow acceptance of his diminished powers—though he doesn't recognize, as one might hope he would, the damage his earlier actions have done to his children. Still, the grudging affection the siblings show each other as they struggle with their shared burden seems to afford their father a measure of forgiveness. And in the process, the brother and sister take baby steps towards becoming more compassionate and connected people than their deeply flawed parents could have shown them how to be.
(Review by Margaret Guroff)




November 2007


Lions

United Artists

Lions for Lambs (R)
starstarstarstarstar

So many things are so very wrong with Robert Redford's Lions for Lambs that it's tempting to simply say it's the worst-executed piece of big-screen propaganda since movie producer/God incarnate Sun Myung Moon got Laurence Olivier to play Douglas MacArthur in his anti-Commie epic Inchon, and to leave it at that.

But I sat through an hour and a half of this thing and, doggone it, somebody’s gonna pay. In the past year we’ve already seen some pretty good movies that touch on America’s Middle East policies—especially In the Valley of Elah and The Kingdom. While standing fast to their principles, films like these draw upon universally shared human experiences. Whether you agree with the filmmaker’s take or not, you at least come away having had a unique glimpse into the human condition, something all good films should provide.

You’d expect to get something like that here from director-star Redford, whose deftly humane touch nurtures just about everything he creates (Ordinary People, The Horse Whisperer, A River Runs Through It). But this time Redford—determined to convince us all that America’s involvement in Iraq and environs has been disastrous—simply sits us down and yells at us (and by the way, how many dozen people out there still believe for one moment it’s been going swimmingly over there?).

First we meet Ace Reporter Meryl Streep, staring down Smug Republican Senator Tom Cruise. He’s summoned her to his office to tell her about America’s new, can’t-miss military initiative in Afghanistan, which seems to involve putting a couple of GIs on the peaks of every tall mountain in the country. Next we meet two of those lucky soldiers, who have names in the movie, but I’ve forgotten them because they’re not really characters, they’re just actors in uniforms flailing around in a rocky, snowy landscape every bit as convincing as the set of the musical version of Lost Horizon. And finally we are introduced to Professor Robert Redford, who teaches some kind of course at a school identified in a subtitle as "A California University." He has some tangential connection to the two soldiers—they were students who, upon enrolling in his class, promptly dropped out to join the Army (not the most glowing endorsement a militantly anti-military teacher could get).

So, what we get in Lions for Lambs is a lot of people sitting around talking to each other. Cruise gets seriously into Streep’s face, mouthing Bush-like bromides (and seriously, in what universe are we to be expected to buy Tom Cruise as a neocon?). Uptight and anxiously scribbling in her notepad (although always on the same page, on the same top line, it appears) Streep gives by far the best performance in the film. Which is a lot like saying the Monkey Boy is the most compelling biped in the sideshow. Redford sits in his cramped academic’s office, browbeating a politically disengaged student (newcomer Andrew Garfield, whose eye-rolling and heavy sighing reflect the audience reaction to the whole endeavor). And later Streep heads back to her cable news channel offices, where she engages in yet another heated closed-door conversation with her editor (Kevin Dunn), who flatly refuses her demand to cast the new military strategy as a rerun of Vietnam. He’s hung up on reporting—get this—just the facts.

The net result is one of the most claustrophobic movies in memory. We’re initially relieved to see the soldiers (Michael Peña and Derek Luke) jump out of a helicopter onto an Afghan mountain. At last, we tell ourselves, we’re going to see some action. So what do Redford and screenwriter Matthew Michael Carnahan do with these guys? One suffers a compound leg fracture; the other becomes hopelessly stuck in the snow. So they’re left to, you guessed it, talk to each other for the rest of the movie!

Clearly, someone is proud to be breaking all the rules of good narrative moviemaking here, certain that the sheer power of ideas will catapult Lions for Lambs into the public consciousness. But rules exist for a reason. If you want to see narrative propaganda at its absolute best, go no further than the newly restored version of Sergei Eisenstein’s silent Soviet film classic The Battleship Potemkin. In 80 years, the political immediacy of Eisenstein’s call for a revolution of the proletariat has long since evaporated. But what remains is a breathtaking exercise in filmmaking; the famous Odessa Steps massacre sequence is ripped off shamelessly by directors to this day.

Like the Soviet brand of Communism exalted by Eisenstein in Potemkin, 80 years from now the controversy over U.S. involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan will most likely be a footnote to history. But it’s unlikely that film students of the day will be dissecting Lions for Lambs, except perhaps as a model of how to utterly waste 90 minutes—not to mention three of the biggest stars in the known universe.



Sleuth

Sony Pictures Classics

Sleuth (R)
starstarstarstarstar

With Michael Caine and Jude Law as the stars and Kenneth Branagh as the director—multiple Oscar nominees all—plus Nobel Prize winner Harold Pinter as the writer, well, it should have been easy to make Sleuth a pretty good movie. And apparently it was. Too bad no one seemed inspired to make it a great one.

Not that they didn't try. Branagh labors, too self-consciously, to bring visual sizzle to what is essentially a one-set, two-actor play. Pinter adds a third-act twist that renders playwright Anthony Shaffer's original, ingenious plot resolution into an ambiguous mess. So we're left with only the stars, acting their hearts out and sidestepping the plot holes and self-indulgent camera work with glorious panache.

Caine (and is there on earth a more reliably pleasing screen presence?) stars as an aging crime novelist who meets with his romantic rival, played by the ever-charming Law, in order to have it out with the upstart. Of course, Caine costarred in the original screen version of Sleuth back in 1972, and back then played the young Lothario, opposite the great Laurence Olivier. Caine's is a shrewd re-imagining of the role: Olivier played the part as a spoiled aristocrat, perhaps in a bit over his head as he tries to exact all-too-clever revenge on the man who has stolen his wife. Caine, on the other hand, slowly reveals the long-buried temperament of a street tough. To cross him, the younger man soon begins to realize, can be one of life's great mistakes.

As for Law, just as his character is prepared to counter his adversary's every move, so the actor stands admirably toe-to-toe with Caine. Their encounters—thanks in large part to Pinter's new dialogue, which is his one truly great contribution to the film—crackle with an energy that in the best scenes dials up to megawatt levels. And director Branagh has his moments, too—particularly in his willingness to let the camera linger on his actors, long after most directors would cut away. One scene, involving a gunshot, is followed by an excruciatingly held frame of the shooter standing there, hand outstretched, just staring at the victim. Branagh gives us the longest time to study that face and try to read it. It's a wonderful piece of filmmaking in a film that has enough wonderful pieces to keep you hoping for more…and disappointed to discover there aren't nearly enough of them.

A word must be added about Alec Cawthorne, the actor who appears as the understated Inspector Doppler. I first saw him in this very same role, on the London stage, some 35 years ago, and he has made something of a career of playing it ever since. He remains as curmudgeonly and surprising as ever.




October 2007


No Country for Old Men

Miramax

No Country for Old Men (R)
starstarstarstarstar

The sun-bleached landscapes and stunning sunsets of the American West make a heartbreakingly beautiful backdrop for the black-hearted mayhem that punctuates No Country for Old Men, the Coen brothers' latest foray into the dark recesses of human nature.

In many ways, it's the writing-directing team's most profoundly disturbing vision, and that includes that leg in the woodchipper in Fargo. While the brothers in the past have been satisfied to let the occasional outrageously violent outburst add power to their films, this time they've utterly reversed the formula: the body-count meter starts ticking from the first frames, relieved only by the occasional, sweetly observed moment of human tenderness.

Following a brutal opening sequence, we meet a hunter (Josh Brolin, looking and sounding more like his dad James every year) who stumbles upon the site of a desert drug deal gone wrong. Real wrong. Dead men lie everywhere, each clutching the automatic weapon he went down firing. There's a ton or so of heroin and $2 million in cash. He takes the cash, and soon he's being relentlessly tracked down by a killer (Javier Bardem) who's as cold-blooded as a desert rattler.

As the killer, Bardem is a dead-eyed bundle of pure evil. A brooding devil in a pageboy haircut, he's chillingly likely to turn even the most casual encounter with a stranger into a spectacle of gushing blood. By film's end, when we find ourselves holding our breath whenever Bardem encounters anyone, even the Coens seem ready to shield their eyes—his last several killings happen out of sight and even out of earshot.

Also part of the chase, but barely so, is Tommy Lee Jones as a West Texas sheriff. Sad-eyed and melancholy, with that fatigued, sigh-inducing manner Jones excels in, the sheriff is overwhelmed by the mounting violence he sees, not only in his blood-soaked town, but in the world at large. He's about to retire, but the world he's escaping to, he fears, is no better than the one he's leaving behind. Evil is everywhere, he complains to his deputies, to his friends, and to his wife. And as the film's villain tracks his prey across the Southwestern desert, dark and dangerous as an approaching thunderstorm, it's hard to argue with him.


The Darjeeling Limited

Fox Searchlight

The Darjeeling Limited (R)
starstarstarstarstar

In The Darjeeling Limited, three brothers who have not seen each other since their father's funeral a year earlier find themselves together on a crowded train heading for the foothills of India's Himalaya mountains. Despite their obvious affection for one another, in their cramped compartment they often lash out at each other, like scorpions in a shoebox—no suprise for Wes Anderson fans, as his films (The Royal Tenenbaums and Rushmore) have always explored the gnarly root systems that tangle beneath family trees.

At first we believe the three are on a spiritual journey, but we soon discover the trip has a lot more to do with their missing mother (Anjelica Huston), who never did manage to make it to her hubby's funeral. As the train makes slow progress across the subcontinent, the brothers re-establish their childhood pecking order: Owen Wilson is the oldest, and he still orders his brothers' restaurant meals for them. He's also bandaged like a mummy, after having crashed his motorcycle into a hillside. Second is the marvelous Adrien Brody (The Pianist), whose lanky, deliberate character suggests a thoughtful praying mantis. And youngest is Jason Schwartzman, who will forever be remembered as the sensational Max Fischer in Rushmore. (There's also a delightful, nearly wordless visit from Bill Murray, who is something of a good luck charm for the director's best films.)

Anderson's characters are always colorful, but in India he's finally found a setting to give them some competition. The towns and villages flash by, a blur of blossoming flowers and vividly painted houses. The train itself is a Crayola box of colors, and the temples visited by the brothers fairly explode with blues, reds, and yellows.

And like the titular train, which at one point finds itself lost on a wayward set of tracks, The Darjeeling Limited never really seems to be going anywhere. We're happy to spend time with these engaging characters, but since most of the brothers' most pressing interpersonal problems involve people who aren't there (a pregnant wife, an angry ex-girlfriend, that missing mom), it's kind of hard to invest in them. Really, the film only comes to startling life when the guys, stranded in a village, suddenly find themselves thrust into a local tragedy.

Anderson does offer a resolution of sorts in the final reel. But even for his devotees, there's this nagging sense that the film could have ended at any random point. And that leads to the inevitable question: Was this trip necessary?


Into the Wild

Paramount Vantage

Into the Wild (R)
starstarstarstarstar

Some wonderful supporting performances—including a truly memorable turn by Hal Holbrook—don't quite save Into the Wild from being an overlong, rambling account of a young man's willy-nilly wanderings into self-destruction. But there are moments of beauty, both scenic and human in nature, that make it at times seem like a better picture than it really is.

A film version of Jon Krakauer's book, the movie chronicles the true story of Chris McCandless (Emile Hirsch), a young Emory grad who left his privileged surroundings in 1992 to hit the road and become what was called in more romantic times a hobo. He hops freight trains and hitchhikes his way around the country, at some point focusing his ambition on heading to Alaska and getting as far away from civilization as he possibly can.

Writer-director Sean Penn expects us to buy into Chris's personal voyage, but the character remains too much of an enigma for us to really care too much about him. He's a complex guy, all right, but we never quite figure out, as the hippies he encounters on the road would say, "where his head is at." At times he seems a charming travel companion, easily making friends and working odd jobs. At others he's moody and self-absorbed. He patiently listens to advice from the many people he meets, but there's scant evidence he ever absorbs a word of it. On one hand, he seems to have a uniquely lucid view of his place in the universe; on the other, he writes rambling missives that could be straight from the nubby pencil of the Unabomber.

The contradictions would be fine if there were some connective tissue between them, but the script just keeps careening from one to another. As Chris, Hirsch isn't much help. He's handsome and has a wonderfully open face, with a Candide-like quality of naiveté. But he's all sponge, and never wrings himself out to help us see what odd mix is fermenting inside his character. (I will say, though, that Hirsch is absolutely, positively the perfect choice for his next film, a live-action version of the anime cartoon classic Speed Racer.)

A half-hearted stab is made at explaining Chris's mental state: he grew up watching his wealthy parents beat up on each other, physically and emotionally. That seems to be his motivation for rejecting all materialistic trappings, which he sees as the misplaced focus of their miserable existence. William Hurt and Marcia Gay Harden are the tortured parents, and theirs are the first outstanding performances that keep us from starting our own odyssey for the exits. Hurt's voyage from cold-fish pop to passionately anguished father, told in remarkable actor's shorthand, is riveting. And Harden, with the more difficult role of the mother who emerges from her self-obsessed bubble only when her son disappears, is a marvel of restrained, perpetual panic.

The welcome cameos continue throughout Chris's odyssey. Vince Vaughn, almost unrecognizable as he sheds his wiseguy comic persona, is slyly charming as a Midwestern farmer who teaches Chris how to hold down a job. As the burned-out hippie couple who pick him up along a roadside (is 1992 a bit late for people to refer to themselves as hippies?), the wonderful Catherine Keener (Oscar-nominated for Capote) and a surprising middle-age newcomer named Brian Dierker warmly become the parents Chris wishes he'd had.

But best of all—and the prime reason to stay put for the movie's nearly two-and-a-half-hour run—is Hal Holbrook as an old leather worker that Chris meets in his travels. Holbrook, one of our great actors, has in past years found himself cast in diminished TV roles, or as grumpy authority figures in movies. Here, he blossoms with one of his finest screen performances ever, breathtakingly understated as a man who lost his wife and son to a car accident years ago, and who sees in Chris a chance to finally make an impact on a young man's life. I dare you to watch Holbrook, in his final farewell to the Alaska-bound Chris, and not, like him, find a salty tear running down your cheek.




September 2007


In the Shadow of the Moon

NASA

In the Shadow of the Moon (PG)
starstarstarstarstar

There is a moment in the new documentary In the Shadow of the Moon when Neil Armstrong, piloting the Apollo 11 landing module, reports to Mission Control in Houston: "Program alarm....It's a twelve-oh-two."

To the billions of earthlings hunched over radios or glued to their TV sets that unforgettable summer day, Armstrong's comment passed almost unnoticed. But using rarely seen footage of the Houston controllers, perfectly synced with a recording of the 1969 radio transmission, director David Sington makes its implications startlingly clear. At Armstrong's "twelve-oh-two" announcement, astronaut Charlie Duke, the CapCom (capsule communicator) officer in Houston, suddenly drops his head in near-despair. His open, boyish face reveals the dreadful truth: with the landing module poised above the lunar surface, the first manned moon landing was, very possibly, about to be scrubbed.

As it turns out, the alarm is for a simple computer overload, and the problem is almost instantaneously fixed. But the episode reveals the thread of ever-impending danger that ran through America's 1960s space race—and the astonishing chain of ambition, courage, resourcefulness, and dumb luck that led to Armstrong's One Small Step on July 20, 1969.

We've seen lots of moon landing documentaries in 40 years, and some really good movies based on America's leap into space (The Right Stuff, Apollo 13, Space Cowboys). But Sington—a Brit, of all people—has put together the single most compelling Apollo film document yet. He does it by mining NASA's film archives to find pristine footage (including images from space that would be the envy of any Hollywood special effects wizard), and by getting 10 astronauts from the Apollo program to sit down and tell their stories to the camera. Spectacular as the launch and landing footage is, it's those unforgettable talking heads who give the film its ultimate power. Their faces lined with experience, their eyes somehow smoldering with memories of sights never seen before—nor seen since—they speak with the solemnity and humility of those who have emerged from some mystical experience. Nearly 40 years on, they still struggle at times to convey the awful emptiness and startling beauty of space, and one is reminded of what the space traveler said in Carl Sagan's novel Contact: they should have sent a poet.


3:10 to Yuma

Lionsgate

3:10 to Yuma (R)
starstarstarstarstar

The best movie western since Silverado, 3:10 to Yuma borrows wonderfully from John Ford's epic classics like Stagecoach and She Wore a Yellow Ribbon—and from the great character-driven horse operas like Shane, High Noon, and The Searchers. That's pretty rarified company, and western movies aren't the crowd-pleasers that they used to be, but if this film had unspooled 50 years ago, we'd still be talking about it as one of the greats.

Director James Mangold (Walk the Line; Cop Land; Girl, Interrupted) has done much more than remake a vintage 1957 Glenn Ford vehicle. He's taken the best elements of the quintessentially American film genre and woven them into a complex fabric of showdowns and sweetness, of dust-choked main streets and achingly beautiful New Mexico vistas. And it all powers ahead, unrelentingly, with the pounding urgency of a posse's hoofbeats.

Russell Crowe, in his most satisfying role in years, stars as Ben Wade, a stagecoach bandit who has finally been caught by his longtime nemesis, a bounty hunter (Peter Fonda, who, following up his recent flicks Wild Hogs and Ghost Rider, is having a great year in delightful supporting roles). They're an intriguing pair, these two: despite their venomous contempt for each other, there's a hint that they were at one time both on the same (wrong) side of the law. And they're both capable of exhibiting disarming charm and sophistication—punctuated by explosions of unspeakable violence. Standing between them is Christian Bale, playing a rancher who agrees to help transport Wade to the train that will take him to trial in Yuma. He's the classic western-movie Noble Man, whose only motivations are provision for his family and the bond of his word. And like most Noble Men, in the final reel he finds himself face to face with the ultimate challenge to his treasured integrity.

Even an exquisite film like 3:10 to Yuma won't resurrect the "oater" as a dominant genre; I haven't seen a city kid in a cowboy hat since Bonanza went off the air. But it's gratifying to know that, in the hands of the truly gifted, a western can still pack the wallop of a well-oiled Smith & Wesson.




August 2007


Mr. Bean's Holiday

Universal Pictures

Mr. Bean's Holiday (G)
starstarstarstarstar

For a demonstration of the pure and wonderfully subjective nature of comedy, I give you Mr. Bean's Holiday, the second feature film starring Rowan Atkinson as the spindly, nearly silent, congenitally childish and self-centered character he introduced long ago on the British telly.

After an hour and a half of onscreen Beanisms, the film's credits end with a brief humorous clip, shot on a beach.

"Ooooh!" sneered a fellow critic as he fairly stormed from the theater. "Isn't he soooooo clever!" Then, he virtually spit: "Where's a tsunami when you need one?"

It wasn't just that this guy found the movie unfunny—he was positively ticked off by it. The rest of us who'd stayed through the credits swiveled our heads briefly in his direction, barely making out his retreating figure, because our eyes were unfocused from tears, our cheeks damp with the overflow. We might have shed them laughing; we might have wept for sheer ecstasy, because I want to tell you here and now that Mr. Bean's Holiday—as a pure comedy devoid of meanness, biting satire, ironic commentary, or even shrewd cultural reflections—is to this viewer among the funniest films ever made.

There is a plot, however slight: Bean wins a trip from rainy England to sunny Cannes, and he must get there by train. Any number of diversions nearly keep him from getting to the beach, and they all exist simply to present Bean with an obstacle to which he concocts an utterly inappropriate, yet somehow successful, solution.

Like the greatest screen comics—and I'm thinking the likes of Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd, and Jacques Tati here—Bean is funny on his own terms, in a slightly parallel universe that looks an awful lot like ours, yet is forever being bent to conform to his oddball dimension. It's not a universe that's necessarily friendly to Bean—his bicycle gets run over by a tank that rumbles out of nowhere; doors have a nasty habit of swinging shut and locking him out (or in)—but it's his world, no doubt about it. His misadventures inevitably lead to new opportunities to succeed, which likewise turn disastrous, until finally, almost inexplicably, everything turns out just fine.

That's why I call Bean a pure comedy: Virtually every laugh in the film is organic, growing solely from the set-up situation that precedes it. Bean doesn't ask us to bring any cultural prejudices. Political axes are to be left at the door. Sure, Bean the character is venal and selfish in a childish kind of way, but we're not to read into his peccadilloes any commentary on the human condition. When Bean, finding himself penniless in a French village, turns street performer by miming a recording of Puccini's O Mio Babbino Caro—an aria for soprano—he doesn't clown it up. As Bean, Atkinson commits himself utterly and completely to the piece, selling his performance with all the fierceness of Montserrat Caballé. Likewise, in an inspired finale, Bean takes a hazard-strewn walk to the beach that conjures up memories of the great visual comic Tati (whose classic Mr. Hulot's Holiday has to have been the inspiration for this film)—plus images of the baby Swee' Pea, in those old Popeye cartoons, who almost magically survives a romp at a construction site despite swinging beams, falling bricks, and runaway wheelbarrows.

I empathize with that poor critic who couldn't stand another second of Bean. As with all humor, you either get it or you don't. The fact that the film is rated G—not even PG!—can be an automatic turnoff for anyone who insists that their comedy be dangerous. But in many ways, as he invites us to visit his own off-kilter dimension, Atkinson as Mr. Bean is working a thousand feet up without a net. And that's as dangerous as it gets.


The Simpsons Movie

Twentieth Century Fox

The Simpsons Movie (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

For those of us who despaired of ever seeing Homer Simpson lumber across a big screen, or hearing Bart let loose with that devil-boy cackle in big-theater surround sound, the glorious day of deliverance has finally come. And the best news of all: Even though after 20 years on the air The Simpsons has left its glory days far behind, the multiplex incarnation of the family from Springfield ranks right up there with some of the show's best episodes. Yes, up there with Sideshow Bob and the rakes; Homer and the Stone of Shame; Bart and Stampy the elephant; Moe and his pandas…and if you are lost at this point, then perhaps you'd best just pass this one up and slip into the theater showing Becoming Jane.

This time around, Homer adopts a pig (although Simpsons purists will object that there's no mention of the classic TV episode in which Homer stole a pig mascot, Sir Oinksalot, from a nearby college). That leads to a silo full of pig droppings, which leads to the hopeless pollution of Lake Springfield. Which, of course, leads to the government encasing the entire town of Springfield under a thick glass dome.

The writers, a veteran team dating back to the golden age of The Simpsons, open up the story a bit with a family excursion to Alaska, but really, what we've come here to see is an all-star revue of beloved yellow characters with weird overbites, all taking their moment in the cinema spotlight. The audience I sat with applauded lustily when their favorites made their cameos, and the screening became something of a ritual in that sense—a few hundred individuals, who for nearly 20 years have enjoyed Homer, Marge, and company in the privacy of their own homes, finally getting to share their enthusiasm with a group larger than their circle of Simpsons-loving pals. In fact, I imagine The Simpsons Movie might not be nearly as much fun in an empty theater, nor will it be when it is released on DVD.

Delirious with joy over the arrival of the movie, the hardcore fans I encountered afterward nevertheless seemed just a tad peeved at the script's overt environmental theme. Not that the film is preachy, but I think I know what they were getting at, and as usual, it was a Simpsons quote that helped me put it into perspective. At the end of one memorable episode back in the day—when The Simpsons was the funniest show on TV not by default, but because it was just awesome—Marge tried to come up with a moral to one of the family's more outrageous adventures.

"Perhaps there is no moral to this story," suggested daughter Lisa.

"Exactly," agreed her hubby Homer. "It's just a bunch of stuff that happened."

That was The Simpsons at its best: Homer getting stuck in the waterslide, Bart taking over Kamp Krusty à la Apocalypse Now, Itchy decapitating Scratchy (or is it the other way around?). A bunch of stuff, played strictly for laughs, that somehow burrowed its way into the yellow heart that beats within every one of us.




July 2007


Hairspray

Warner Bros. Entertainment

Hairspray (PG)
starstarstarstarstar

There's nearly nothing that doesn't work in Hairspray, a jubilant film version of the hit Broadway musical, which is itself a re-imagining of writer-director John Waters's 1988 cult classic movie. Exuberantly performed, lovingly crafted, and perfectly cast (including John Travolta as the wide-eyed, rotund mother of the heroine), Hairspray does everything it wants to do, attempts nothing beyond keeping us smiling for a couple of hours, yet almost despite itself ends up as something greater than its delightful parts.

It's 1962 and chubby, charming teenager Tracy Turnblad (Nikki Blonsky) is awakening to another wonderful day in Baltimore. We know it's wonderful because she bounds out of her ramshackle row house with the enthusiasm of Alice entering Wonderland. Skipping off to school, she shares the small treasures along the way: the scampering rats, the neighborhood flasher, the businessman downing his third martini on the way to work. When she misses her school bus and hitches a ride atop a garbage truck, Tracy could not appear more regal if she were arriving in a horse-drawn coach.

Spurned by the cool kids, treated with something less than disdain by her teachers, Tracy lives for 4 p.m., when local TV dance program "The Corny Collins Show" hits the air. Hairspray's skeletal story involves Tracy's landing a regular spot on the program, her pursuit of the "Miss Teenage Hairspray" title, and her determination to racially integrate the show—which heretofore has designated one telecast per month as "Negro Day."

Don't let that sociological reference fool you. Really, Hairspray is an excuse to revel in the fun musical score (a cross between the sweet innocence of Bye Bye Birdie and the urban nightmare of Little Shop of Horrors) and the youthful energy of its cast—especially Blonsky. She's a peppy powder keg who, if there is a Hollywood God, will find a way to triumph over the waif obsession that remains Movieland's modus operandi.

Of course, when Christopher Walken is in a film, the best thing about the film is almost always Christopher Walken—and yes, he very nearly steals the show in Hairspray as Tracy's softhearted dad. Walken's well-known onscreen eccentricities—the oddly halted delivery, the seemingly misplaced syllabic accents—have most recently been channeled into vaguely threatening characters. But here he's the ultimate softy, the proprietor of what he calls "the Taj Mahal of joke shops," a doting dad and the passionately devoted husband of, well…John Travolta. Actually, that would be Travolta—prodigiously padded and sporting a tent-like housecoat—as Edna Turnblad. It takes us precisely 20 seconds to get past the fact that Saturday Night Fever's Tony Manero is here in drag. After that, we're swallowing his disguise—bra hook, eyeliner, and kitchen sink. Edna, so meek and housebound that she hasn't set foot on the sidewalk in a decade, is the movie's transcendent character. At first horrified at the thought of her daughter following a dream, she not only becomes the girl's most enthusiastic supporter, she begins to formulate some dreams of her own. Travolta and Walken even share the movie's most sublime musical moment, a love song and dance number that, at my screening, had the audience demanding that the projectionist rewind and play it again. Sadly, it turned out that the projectionist, like most these days, was a computer. But Hairspray, as slick and fine-tuned as a movie musical can be, is at the same time gloriously human in its celebration of everyone's aspiration to make their dreams come true. The whole film breathes the authentic air of unadulterated fun.



Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Warner Bros. Entertainment

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

The way I look at it, if I'm going to read an 800-page novel after all these years, it's gonna be Anna Karenina. So I'm really glad they went and made a nice, compact two-hours-plus-change movie of J.K. Rowling's back spasm-inducing Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. And I'm even happier to report that I don't feel the least bit cheated: this installment in the Potter canon is the best so far. It's a long way from the cute high jinks of the first couple of episodes and a step or two back from the last two, which seemed to wallow a bit too much in a gathering sense of unfocused doom.

This time around the peril is absolutely clear; well, at least it is to Harry, who when we last visited him was witnessing the death of a friend at the hands of the evil and noseless wizard Voldemort. Harry's having a hard time convincing anyone in authority that He Who Must Not Be Named (but who is, and often) has returned to the world of wizards, but he does manage to drum up a platoon of fellow student wizards to resist the expected assault. Their undercover training sessions, led by the ever-blossoming young Harry, give the film a satisfying, subversive element, a sense of real youthful rebellion, that until now has been missing from the young wizard's saga. Director David Yates fills these scenes with a delightful mix of enthusiasm and wonder as the maturing youngsters thrill to the notion of harnessing their talents—a sentiment anyone who remembers those awkward years can relate to.

Adolescent angst has been the subtext of all the Potter films, and one of the best things about them, no matter who's directing, has been their uncanny knack for superimposing classic kid concerns against a fantastic backdrop. In the end, Harry's anxieties revolve around the fear of rejection, dreams of hitherto untapped greatness, and every kid's smoldering desire to break out of the mindless strictures of a grownup society that just doesn't understand. Of course, in this case they're played out in a universe where Grim Reaper-like ghosts threaten to suck all the happiness from your brain, and if you don't like the new headmistress, you can always have her dragged off by a herd of centaurs.

Thankfully, in Phoenix Potter and company are not left utterly adrift. Hovering nearby, just beyond Harry's reckoning, is a cloud of thoughtful, nurturing grownups, secretly sheltering him from a warehouse full of secret threats that no kid should have to face up to. The adults in Harry's world make little more than cameo appearances, but they are an essential anchor: Harry is not a street urchin out of Dickens, nor even an abandoned boy out of a Roald Dahl story. His every step is being watched, measured, and guided, whether he likes it or not.

That's one of the reasons Phoenix is such a triumph. Youthful stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint continue to grow and delight as performers. No less enchanting is the who's who of British film and theater puttering around in the background: Maggie Smith, Julie Walters, Alan Rickman, Michael Gambon—and Emma Thompson, whose brief appearance as a bespectacled, meekest-of-them-all teacher is as funny, touching, and heartbreaking as any major role in the whole film.

And special mention must be made regarding one of the crown jewels of Britain's acting corps, the endlessly resourceful Imelda Staunton. She plays a pink-clad, endlessly tittering villainess with a Cheshire cat smile—a mean-spirited schoolmarm with a taste for torture—and she attacks the role with the same reckless gusto that earned her an Oscar nomination in the searing drama Vera Drake a few years back. You can have all the pasty-faced warlocks and smoky Dementors that Phoenix serves up, but scariest of all is the little woman who embodies the worst qualities of every bad teacher you ever had. Yikes.



You Kill Me

IFC Films

You Kill Me (R)
starstarstarstarstar

We don't generally think of Ben Kingsley—he of Gandhi and House of Sand and Fog—as a regular laff riot. That great stone face, that clipped, measured delivery, that palpable intensity he brings to each role he plays; all combine to create an expectation of weighty meaningfulness whenever he's on screen. And the fact is, it's those very qualities that make his new role as an alcoholic hit man in You Kill Me among the funniest film performances you'll ever see.

When we first meet Frank Falenczyk, he's hanging out at home, waiting to go assassinate a potential rival to his gangster family's Buffalo businesses. But when Frank proves too drunk to get the job done, the family sends him to San Francisco to dry out, get into a twelve-step program, and come back with a clearer mind and a steadier hand. So off he goes, and soon Frank is taking rehabilitation so seriously, he's not only standing up before his AA group announcing "I'm an alcoholic," he's also expressing to them his heartfelt desire to get back to what he does best, killing people.

You Kill Me is as finely focused a comedy as you'll find, an intimate probe into the mind of a guy who is utterly comfortable with who and what he is (Frank doesn't even mind being an alcoholic all that much—he just likes killing people more than he does drinking). He is, however, so inwardly focused that he is endlessly surprised to discover the presence of other people in his life. When speakers introduce themselves at his AA meetings and the room erupts in a unison "hello," he is unfailingly startled, in a wonderfully subdued sort of way. When he finds a girlfriend (Tea Leoni)—or more to the point, when she finds him—he confesses to her a certain amount of regret over killing so many people, but only in having "killed them badly" because of his drinking.

Speaking of confessions, I've got to admit here that I've had Leoni all wrong for several years. She seemed overbearingly earnest and needlessly intense in films that didn't call for it (Deep Impact, The Family Man, Spanglish), and I had her down as a pretty humorless leading lady. But here, and in other recent films like the underrated Fun With Dick and Jane, she's emerged as one of the most reliably funny screen actors around. Her mercurial You Kill Me character fairly bounces off the staid Kingsley, drawing out, ever so slowly, the weirdly appealing being at his hitman's heart.




June 2007


Ocean's Thirteen

Warner Bros.

Ocean's Thirteen (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

Before anyone goes complaining about how director Steven Soderbergh's Ocean's franchise is getting a tad tired and predictable in this, its third installment, please be my guest and rent a copy of the 1960 original Ocean's Eleven. Watch it just to remind yourself what an awful, hackneyed mess it is, swaggering drunkenly with its fake hipness, forced camaraderie, and smug satisfaction in knowing we squares in the audience are, like, cuckoo just to bask in the big-screen coolness of Frank, Dean, Sammy, and Peter.

In a contrast as striking and refreshing as a sudden downpour on a hot Vegas afternoon, Ocean's Thirteen unfolds with an easy, friendly saunter. There's initial furor over the betrayal of a pal (that would be Elliott Gould), our gentleman heroes give fair warning to the bad guy (a toothy, blow-dried Al Pacino), and then our beloved team of grifters, thieves, and con men goes to work extracting revenge (and millions of dollars) from their blustering mark. Third time around, even the plot fillips seem mere opportunities for stars George Clooney, Brad Pitt, and Matt Damon to slip into jaunty, devil-may-care banter. In fact, the dialogue crackles with unexpected freshness, no doubt due to the writers, series newcomers Brian Koppelman and David Levien, whose vastly underrated flicks Rounders and Knockaround Guys were feasts of authentically masculine interplay.

And really, Ocean's Thirteen is one genuine guy film. Sinatra would have run from a screening of this one bellowing, "Where's da dames?" This time there's no Julia Roberts on star George Clooney's arm, no Catherine Zeta-Jones to keep co-star Brad Pitt interested. We do get Ellen Barkin, sultry/scary as ever, but she's cast in the part of the sexually repressed closet heller—the kind of role Cloris Leachman made a second career at. She's no threat to the guys, and they've got her number from the start.

Perhaps Ocean's Thirteen's most endearing quality is its willingness to stop every once in awhile to take a thoughtful breath. At the height of the plot's insanity (it all has something to do with driving Pacino bankrupt at the opening of his own casino), Clooney and Pitt take a moment to lean over a balustrade by the fountain outside the posh Bellagio resort. One by one, they point out the spots where the grand casinos of the past once stood: the Sands, the Dunes, the Desert Inn. "They built 'em smaller back then," sighs Pitt. "Yeah," replies Clooney, "but they seemed big."

Like those extinct gambling palaces, Ocean's Thirteen harkens back to a day when the whiff of danger was enough to pave the desert highways to Las Vegas and sell out a week of Rat Pack shows at the Sands—and concedes that it's no longer enough. Today people want a little class, a little brains with their booze. In exquisitely measured helpings, Soderbergh and company deliver just that. And it's beginning to look like they can do it in their sleep.



Knocked Up

Universal Studios

Knocked Up (R)
starstarstarstarstar

The unfortunately crass title of the new comedy Knocked Up will probably keep a lot of thoughtful moviegoers away, and that's too bad. Yes, the characters exhibit a vulgar, hedonistic streak—some of them relentlessly so. And if crass sexual humor and one or two lengthy, acrobatic bedroom scenes will inevitably send you for the exits, then you might want to take a pass.

But if you stay, you'll discover that beneath Knocked Up's frat house demeanor is a strangely warm and subversively moral take on growing up, taking responsibility, and the satisfaction that can come from doing the right thing.

Twentysomething Ben (Seth Rogen) is an aimless, virtually useless loafer, permanently stuck in his late teens, living in a house full of like-minded slackers. Then, in a twist of fate straight out of "Letters to Penthouse," he finds himself in a one-night tryst with Alison (Grey's Anatomy star Katherine Heigl)—an impossibly beautiful, deliriously successful blonde cable TV reporter. From this union (surprise!) a baby is begotten, and the two with remarkable swiftness decide they will see the pregnancy (and perhaps parenthood) through together. Of course, Ben has a lot to learn about…well, just about everything. The balance of the film, which contains most of its charm, involves the pair's coming to terms with not only the new life they've created but also the possibility of a new life as a couple.

Heigl is a revelation as the upwardly mobile woman who sees her life turned upside down. There's absolutely no trace of the cloud of mopey, whiny, self-indulgence that blankets Grey's Anatomy (and really, don't you just want to slap all of those guys?). As a comic actor, Heigl wields a sense of perfect timing and a delightfully open, incredulous face.

Writer-director Judd Apatow—who also came up with The 40-Year-Old Virgin a couple of years back—has become the master of pushing the limits of taste while adhering to a remarkably traditional set of values. He fills his stories with good people trying to find a moral foothold in an aggressively sleazy world, thoughtful characters who are told at every turn, "Don't think…just react." Their failures provide the laughs; their ultimate victories are unexpectedly gratifying.




May 2007


Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End

Walt Disney Pictures

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (PG-13)
starstarstarstarstar

Here's what you need to know about Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End before you go see it: in the first 10 minutes, the villains hang a 10-year-old boy. That's right, they lift him up onto a barrel, put a noose around his neck, pop open a trap door, and snap his neck. A few minutes later, a young woman is shot, point blank, between the eyes.

Are we having fun yet?

Am I mis-remembering the first two episodes in this series? Wasn't there a sense of swashbuckling abandon and giddy irreverence about it? I seem to remember being charmed by the Halloweenish-ness of it all: the outlandish settings, the over-the-top villains, the monsters that cartoonishly threatened doom but never really delivered it. Even at the end of last year's Part II, as pirate Jack Sparrow, brandishing his saber, walked into the maw of that giant squid, he did it with a bravado that took the edge off any menace of his demise.

Somewhere along the way, the creators seem to have gotten a case of Harry Potter pox: a belief that as the story progresses, things must necessarily become darker, more sinister, more "real." But while there are those who put J.K. Rowling's increasingly scary Harry Potter books into the realm of literature, nobody, but nobody, is threatening the same for Pirates ("Read the Disney paperback!").

Indeed, the only person here who seems determined to give us a good time is Johnny Depp, whose mincing, verbose Jack Sparrow re